Veteran showbiz columnist Cristy Fermin has once again made headlines—this time not for a celebrity scoop, but for her candid and fiery reaction to a high-profile political interview between Karen Davila and Senator Imee Marcos. In a recent episode of her online commentary program Cristy Ferminute, Fermin weighed in on the tone, direction, and implications of the now-viral exchange, while also name-dropping two of the Philippines’ most respected broadcast journalists: Jessica Soho and Mel Tiangco.

The interview in question aired as part of a political series by ABS-CBN’s Davila, where she sat down with Senator Imee Marcos to discuss a range of political topics, including the Marcos family’s legacy, governance, and current national issues. While the interview was generally well-received, it also stirred debates on media neutrality and journalistic style.

Cristy Fermin, known for her unfiltered takes, took exception to the tone of Davila’s questions, suggesting that they bordered on “disrespectful” and “aggressive.” Fermin claimed that although Karen Davila has the right to ask tough questions, the delivery might have crossed a line, especially when dealing with a sitting senator. “It’s one thing to ask incisive questions—it’s another thing to sound like you’re prosecuting someone,” Fermin said.

In contrast, Fermin praised Jessica Soho and Mel Tiangco, both GMA News icons, for what she described as their “balanced, dignified, and intelligent” interview styles. “Jessica and Mel ask hard questions too, but you never feel like there’s an agenda. They let the facts speak for themselves,” she stated. Fermin implied that the emotional and occasionally confrontational tone seen in Davila’s interview detracted from its journalistic integrity.

Her remarks have sparked conversations online, with netizens divided. Some agree with Fermin’s view that interviews should maintain civility and mutual respect, especially when dealing with national leaders. Others believe that journalists like Davila are doing what needs to be done in holding powerful figures accountable.

This isn’t the first time Fermin has touched on political topics. While her roots are in showbiz, she has occasionally ventured into sociopolitical discussions, especially when they intersect with public figures.

Critics of Fermin argue that her background in entertainment journalism may not lend itself to informed commentary on serious political matters. Supporters, however, appreciate her boldness in voicing unpopular opinions.

In an age where media personalities and politicians often clash, Fermin’s commentary underscores a deeper issue: the fine line between journalistic duty and personal tone. The question remains—should interviews be confrontational to extract the truth, or should they prioritize diplomacy to maintain open dialogue?

Whatever the case, Cristy Fermin’s take has once again made her the center of a conversation—this time, one that reaches far beyond the world of entertainment.