MANILA, Philippines – Calls for change echoed through the streets, but each cry seemed to carry bitterness and danger. Amid the raging issue of corruption and political tension, one name once again made headlines and ignited heated discussions: former Ilocos Sur Governor Luis “Chavit” Singson. But this time, not for his usual controversies, but for a call with the weight of revolution—a call that pushed the Palace to take action and investigate his words.

The Surprising Debut in the Middle of Protest

Chavit Singson’s closeness to political events is not unknown to many. But his sudden appearance at a recent rally has sparked intense concern and anger. Many were surprised to see Singson, along with Philip Salvador, at a gathering whose main purpose was to denounce government corruption and the current administration. The question on everyone’s mind: why was a personality who had long been associated with the old system, and who was even part of the “corrupt government” that the protesters were condemning, there?

The answer came quickly, but not in the way Singson had expected. His arrival was greeted with loud “boos” from the rallyists, a sign that he was not welcome. In an interview, Singson described the rally as “chaotic,” and immediately blamed the rallyists, saying they had “self-interests.” But the public’s quick reaction hinted at a deeper issue: Singson’s shamelessness among the people he supports, or whom he supports for his own interests.

The Call for “Overhaul” and “Revolutionary Government”

The shock Chavit Singson brought did not end there. In a video that went viral, he openly expressed his deep disappointment with the current government. According to him, “nothing will happen” and “the government is rotten.” But the most serious of all is his call for a “total overhaul” of the system, which even goes as far as the idea of ​​a “revolutionary government.”

“My suggestion,” said Singson, “it should be a meeting. Remove BBM, then the military, police, and all the justices, Supreme Court justices, and all the religious organization meet to form a new government.”

A “revolution”? These words have caused concern not only among ordinary citizens but also among government officials. The call to remove the sitting president and form a new government, outside the constitutional process, is a serious matter with major implications for the security and order of the country.

Malacañang Instigates Investigation: Inciting to Sedition?

The Palace soon took action. Communications Undersecretary Claire Castro quickly issued a statement, urging the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Philippine National Police (PNP) to investigate Chavit Singson. The possible charge: inciting to sedition.

According to Castro, President Marcos wanted to hold accountable anyone who incited violence or disorder at rallies. It is important to examine Singson’s statements, especially since he allegedly incited young people, including minors, to skip class and join his “movement” for revolution.

“Is that right?” Castro asked, referring to Singson’s call to students. “Tell the students, first year high school, don’t go to school? Okay, go there. Protest against the government. Is that right, coming from a former government official?”

The Danger of Looking Back: Who Will Lose?

Singson’s call for a revolution has profound implications. The video points out that if there is unrest, the poor will be the biggest losers. Jobs will be lost, businesses will close, and minimum wage earners will have nothing to gain. Meanwhile, the rich, like Singson, have enough savings to live on for a long time or move to another country. The poor children he incited to skip school will be the ones who will lose their future.

The rallyists who were “paid” or “coaxed” to cause trouble are the poor who are being used by the “interested” to divert the issue and prevent investigations into corruption. There were also reports of violence at the rally, such as pelting stones at establishments, burning tires, and assaulting police officers. Those who funded and instigated these incidents must also be held accountable.

Chavit Singson, Is There an Interest?

The video hinted that Singson’s sudden “criticism” of the government could be connected to the corruption issues he is involved in. He only spoke out when the government was corrupt because his construction firm was hit by corruption allegations.

“Why have you been silent for the longest time? Because you are benefiting from the corrupt government that you are condemning now,” the video challenges.

It is clearly implied that Singson’s call for revolution is a way to stop investigations against him and his relatives who are officials in Ilocos Sur who are also allegedly involved in government contracts.

The Shadow of General Torre: Who Will Enforce the Law?

Amidst all this, one name resurfaces in the conversation: General Torre. In the video, the current Acting PNP Chief General Nartates Jr. is compared to General Torre. The implication: if General Torre were in charge, the rallies would not be so chaotic and the pursuit of those involved would be more successful, no matter how rich or influential they are.

“I don’t know if Nartates can implement that to catch Singson, because it’s so fast,” according to the video, referring to the speed of arrests of personalities like Digong (former President) and Kibuloy (Quiboloy). “Even if he’s influential, even if he’s very rich, for example Singson, if ever probable cause is established that Chavit Singson did something that was really inciting to sedition, he’s guarded, right? He has a lot of security. Can he enter the house? That’s the question.”

It was implied that a “General Torre” is needed in this situation—an officer who is impartial and has the courage to arrest anyone who breaks the law, no matter how powerful or wealthy they are. The law against “inciting to sedition” is clear: anyone who incites others to rise up against the authorities or disturbs the public peace can be imprisoned for up to six years. But in the case of a “wealthy” defendant, the appeals process can be used to drag the case all the way to the Supreme Court.

The Final Challenge: Accountability for All

Chavit Singson’s call for revolution is not just a political statement; it is a challenge to the peace and order of the country. The Palace has sent a clear message: no one is exempt. If it is proven that Singson incited sedition, he will have to answer for his words and the possible impact they may have on society, especially the poor and the impressionable youth.

The nation is on alert, waiting for action. Is this the beginning of a sweeping purge, where everyone is equal before the law, no matter how high their position or how deep their pockets? The answer will be determined in the coming days and how government agencies will deal with this challenge. Hopefully, this time, justice will be blind to influence and only see the truth.